Philosophy of Language 논문 정리
이 글은 영미 언어철학을 공부하는데 필요한 논문의 이름을 정리한 글입니다. 필요하신 분은 아래를 클릭해주세요!
다음에서 소개할 논문들의 출처는 다음과 같은 약자로 표시 합니다.
L = Peter Ludlow. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
M3 = A. P. Martinich. The Philosophy of Language. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
M4 = A. P. Martinich. The Philosophy of Language. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
RT = Jay F. Rosenberg and Charles Travis. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Prentice Hall, 1971.
기본적으로 미리 읽어야 할 책들
Kenneth Taylor. Truth and Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.
Bob Hale and Crispin Wright. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997
Scott Soames. Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999
읽어야 할 논문
분야: Truth and meaning
Gottlob Frege. The thought (1925). L 9-30
Alfred Tarski. The semantic conception of truth (1944). M3 61-84, M4 69-91, L
H. P. Grice. Meaning (1957). M3 85-91, M4 92-97
Donald Davidson. Truth and meaning (1967). L 89-108, M3 92-103, M4 98-109
P. F. Strawson. Meaning and Truth (1970). M3 104-114, M4 110-119
분야: The analytic/synthetic distinction
W. V. O. Quine. Two dogmas of empiricism (1951). M3 39-52, M4 47-60, RT 63-80
H. P. Grice and P. F. Strawson. In defense of a dogma (1956) RT 81-93
Hilary Putnam. The analytic and the synthetic (1966) RT 94-125
Aaron Sloman, “Necessary”, “a priori” and “analytic”, Analysis 26, 1965-6, pp. 12-16.
Saul Kripke. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980. Lecture I.
분야: Reference, descriptions, proper names
Gottlob Frege. On sense and reference/nominatum (1892). L 563-584, M3 186-198, M4 199-211
Bertrand Russell. On denoting (1905). M3 199-207, M4 212-220
Bertrand Russell. Descriptions (1919). L 323-335, M3 208-214, M4 221-227, RT 166-174
P. F. Strawson. On referring (1950). L 335-360, M3 215-230, M4 228-242, RT 175-194
John Searle. Proper names (1958). L 585-592, M3 249-254, RT 212-218
Keith Donnellan. Reference and definite descriptions (1966). L 361-382, M3 231-243, M4 247-258, RT 195-211
Gareth Evans. The causal theory of names (1973). L 635-656, M3 271-284, M4 296-307
Saul Kripke. Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. L 383-414
Saul Kripke. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980. Lecture I and II
Hilary Putnam. Meaning and reference (1973). M3 284-291, M4 288-295
David Kaplan. Demonstratives. In: Joseph Almog and John Perry (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 481-563
Nathan Salmon, Reference and information content. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic IV
분야: Propositional attitudes
W. V. O. Quine. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes (1956) Jac 285-291, M3 330-336, M4 355-360
Donald Davidson. On saying that (1968) L 817-832, M3 337-346, M4 361-370
David Kaplan. Quantifying In (1968) Jac 318-337, M3 347-368, M4 371-391
Saul Kripke. A puzzle about belief (1979) L 875-920, M3 382-409, M4 405-431
David Kaplan. Opacity. In: Lewis E. Hahn and Paul A. Schilpp. The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986, 229-289
분야: Speech acts
J. L. Austin. How to do things with words. 2nd Edition. Cambrigde: Harvard University Press, 1975.
John Searle. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. Part I.
H. P. Grice. Logic and conversation. In: Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989
간단한 문제들
-
What is rigid designation? State and assess Kripke’s arguments that proper names such as ‘Aristotle’ and ‘Moses’ are rigid designators.
-
State and assess the modal argument against descriptivism.
-
What is Frege’s Puzzle? Explain how Frege attempts to resolve it in his ‘On Sense and Reference.’
-
State the main features of Russell’s theory of descriptions and explain how this theory handles the puzzle about George IV.
-
Explain the phenomenon of referential use of definite descriptions. Is this a problem for Russell’s theory of descriptions?
-
Assess the following argument: 9 is the number of planets, Necessarily, 9 is odd, Therefore, Necessarily the number of planets is odd.
-
Describe a Tarskian definition of truth for a simple language L, and assess the view that a theory of meaning for L can be cast in the form of such a definition.
-
A sign reads “Thank you for not smoking!” Analyze this according to the theory of speech acts.
-
Explain Davidson’s slingshot argument in “Truth and meaning”? What does it show, if anything, about the role of facts in the theory of meaning.
출처: http://www.phil.ucalgary.ca/philosophy/grad/language.html